v0010-47

No. 66,

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals,

NINTH CIRCUIT.

UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, BRIEF

Plaintiff in Ert'orA ^^

vs. ( DEFENDANT

JOHN T. REESE, ^^

I ERROR.

Defendant in Error.

. M. Thurston, Esq.,

1. 1. Shropshire, Esq., George Haldorn, Esq.,

Attys.for Plff. in Error. Atty.for Deft, in Error.

OCT 6-

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0010

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0010

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0010#page/n46/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

depositions, cross, ev, transcript, inadmissable, damages, prove, deposition, similar, presumption, answers, admissable, wharton, objections, mitigation

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

specific objections, cross examined, union pacific, transcript bill, thurston esq., though similar, shropshire esq., pacific railway, mitigate damages., inter alia, haldorn esq., george haldorn, exami nation, evi dence, cross exami

Document Status: UGLY