v0148-484

IN THE

UNITED STATES CIt^CUlTCOUt?T

OF RPPERIiS

for tine Nintln Circuit

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CHARLES EISENBEIS, et. al.,

Defendants.

Charles Eisenbeis and

Kate Eisenbeis,

Appella7tts and

Plaintiffs in Error.

vs.

1. }.I. Long, Clementine Long and

Francis L. Bash,

Petitioners.^ Appellees

and Defendants in Error.

No. 691

MAY?

E

190

Writ of Error and Appeal from the United States

District Court for the District of Washington,

Northern Division.

BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS AND PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR

1. 1. COLEMAN and

Wm. H. BRINKER,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs in

Error and Appellants.

THE YERKES-FELL PRINTING CO., SEATTLE, WASH.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0148

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0148

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0148#page/n483/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

jurisdiction, ed, land, district, fund, eisenbeis, supreme, petition, superior, 1895, rendered, washington, 1st, exclusive, courts

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

1st 1895, december 5th, charles eisenbeis, 5th 1899, jefferson county, february 7th, november 1st, kate eisenbeis, juris diction, county washington, conflicting claims, 7th 1898, jurisdiction thus, german sav., exclusive jurisdiction

Document Status: UGLY