v0218-214

No.

896

77V THE

Hnttⁱ BtuttB (SUvmit (Hanvt nf Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCJIT.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

VS.

ESTATE OF BERNICE PAUAHI BISH-

OP, Deceased, et Al.,

DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

HONOLULU PLANTATION COMPANY CASE.

Brief for Plaintiff in Error*

1. 1. DUNNE,

Ass't U. S. Attorney, Dist. of Hawaii,

Counsel for Plaintiff in Error.

THE ITAK PNISS ^AKCt H. AIIRY

GCr 5 1302

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0218

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0218

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0218#page/n213/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

land, market, id, property, plantation, exception, dunne, errors, laws, petitioner, honolulu, assignment, section, july, leasehold

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

honolulu plantation, civil laws, exceptions exception, leasehold interest, july 1901, property sought, cane land, sugar produced, penal laws, eminent domain, july 6th, ubi supra, land sought, halawa valley, water supply

Document Status: UGLY