v0243-369

NO. 958.

IN THE

iiDi w (iDoii or am

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

1. AUGUSTUS HEINZE and F.

AUGUSTUS HEINZE, as Admin-

istrator of tlie Estate of JAMES

LARKIN, Deceased, and CLARA,

1. LARKIN,

Appellants,

vs.

THE BUTTE AND BOSTON CON-

SOLIDATED MINING COM-

PANY, a Corporation, and JOHN

1. HARRIS, Receiver,

Appellees.

FILED

OCT -5 1303

BRIEF AND ARGUMENT OF APPELLEE, THE

BUTTE AND BOSTON CONSOLIDATED

MINING COMPANY.

JOHN F. FORBIS and L. O. EVANS,

Solicitors and of Counsel for Appellee, the Butte and

Boston Consolidated Mining Company.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0243

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0243

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0243#page/n368/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

receiver, receivership, property, lower, mining, heinze, application, claims, heinzes, lode, appointment, ores, orders, larkin, operations

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

lode claims, mining operations, augustus heinze, boston consolidated, consolidated mining, snohomish lode, james larkin, fictitious claims, evi dence, tramway lode, section 592, receiver ship, lode claims., legislative assembly, joint tenants

Document Status: UGLY