v0544-751

No. 1710.

IN THE

United States Circuit Court ol Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit.

WILLIAM E. KELLEY and

ALLAN H. DAUGHARTY, as

copartners, doing business under

the firm name and style of W. E.

KELLEY & COMPANY,

Plaintiffs in Error,

VS.

1. 1. BENTON,

Defendant in Error.

ORAL ARGUMENT OF J. F. BOWIE, ESQ.,

FOR PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.

. ifea t

^ nea this day of March, 1910.

Frank D. Monckton, Clerk.

By Deputy Clerk.

The Mubdock Press, 68 Fremont St., San Feancisco.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0544

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0544

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0544#page/n750/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

contract, lumber, findings, delivered, benton, kelley, oral, cal, shop, written, statute, performance, estimate, actually, tally

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

written contract, white pine, civil code, actual tally, actually delivered, 297 175, lumber shipped, lumber actually, california sugar, 451 257, subsequent oral, purchase price, oral modification, lum ber, issues raised

Document Status: UGLY