v0826-117

Document Title Page

J

dircuit dourt of Hppcate

THE CITY OF FORSYTH, an Incorporated

City of the Third Class of the State of Mon

tana, formerly the TOWN OF FORSYTH,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

    1. CRELLIN, W. H. JACKSON and B.
  1. MOSS, Copartners Doing Business Under

the Firm Name and Style of DES MOINES

BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY,

Defendants in Error.

BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT.

In the statement of the ease by plaintiff in er-

ror, (Brief 4), reference is made to Judge Bour-

quin's findings and decision. (Tr. 68). The opinion

is a terse, lucid exposition of the legal propositions

involved herein.

To quote the Bill of Exceptions, (Tr. 68),


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0826

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0826

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0826#page/n116/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

city, council, presented, statute, verified, waived, contract, paid, demand, waiver, village, water, presentation, itemized, mandatory

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

city council, water works, section 3283, pre sented, ludington 74, water plant, portland 76, mon tana, common council, ac count, statute provides, sections 3283, river cattle, revised codes, public policy

Document Status: UGLY