v0827-421
^
INDEX AND SUMMARY
PAGE
I to
8
8 to
16
i6to
21
22 to
24
25 to
27
28 to
34
34 to
43
Statement of the case.
Wilfley table and its operation.
Deister table and its operation.
Special features of Deister table
Wilfley patent and claims in suit.
Not infringed by Deister concentrator.
Cases on construction and force of patent
claims.
43 to 67 Discussion of opinion of the District
Court and the assignments of error
therein.
61 to 63 Comparative test of Wilfley and Deister
tables : Deister far ahead.
64 to 65 Comparative areas and weights of Wilfley
and Deister tables. Deister does as
much work on 33.6 sq. ft. as Wilfley
on 78 sq. ft.
68 to 74 The experts Richards and Hodges shown
up. Wickedness of their testimony
exposed.
74 to 75 The Supreme Court's views on patent
experts ; condemning such expert testi-
mony as was given in this case.
76 to 83 Railway v. Sayles, 97 U. S., 554 and cases
following it.
83 to 90 McCormick v. Talcott, 20 How. 402 and
cases following it.
90 to 93 Review of the patent statutes with diri-
vation of the proposition (on page 92)
that the decisions of the courts con-
stitute the patent law of today.
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0827
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0827
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0827#page/n420/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
table, patent, riffles, deister, claims, smooth, concentrates, wilfley, invention, riffle, wilfiey, form, length, surface, water
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
deister table, reciprocating movement, wilfley patent, head toward, concentrating table, upper edge, ore concentrator, concentrates discharge, sayles 97, riffles extending, unriffled surface, transversely inclined, specific form, lower edge, smooth space
Document Status: UGLY