v0848-587

CUtrrmt Olourt of Appeals

Jnr tlf^ Nitttl) Qltrruit

HENRY W. BASSETT,

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

THE ERICKSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

a Corporation,

Defendant in Error.

WRIT OF ERROR FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON,

NORTHERN DIVISION.

HON. CLINTON W. HOWARD, Judge.

REPLY BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

The opening paragraph in the defendant's brief

discloses the fact that he is not familiar with patent

law procedure; he makes the statement that the ques-

tions before this Court are those of fact and not of

law. Also that the Jury found no invention. The Jury's

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0848

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0848

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0848#page/n586/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

patent, claims, elements, makes, wherein, specification, segments, royalty, fails, damages, construction, combination, allowed, invention, amendment

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

washington northern, vitrified brick, secure exact, prevent peripheral, moulded conduits, exact registry, established royalty, clearly discloses, wrapper file, wholly lacking, western district, vice uses, vertently misquotes, unsuccessful attempts, tlf nitttl

Document Status: UGLY