v0855-605

United States

Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY,

a Corporation.

Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

CHARLES HARAFAN.

Defendant in Error.

BRIEF OF DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

For l)re'ity. we call the i)laintiff in error the "Conl)an^ :"

defendant in error "flarm^m.""

We feel constrained to re-state the case. We are not satis-

hcd with plaintiff's statement.

vSomewhat like the classic of Marshall. C. J., concerning one

of Pinckney's ari^nnienls :

"Connsel. with the hrnsh of an artist, has )aintc(l a

wondrous i)ictnre. It chained the mind of us all hv the

precision of its lines of perspective and its happy choice

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0855

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0855

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0855#page/n604/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

car, train, negligence, clear, track, engineer, chance, tunnel, peril, ha, doctrine, push, trains, struck, stop

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

push car, clear chance, clear chance., antecedent negligence, air brakes, ne er, contributory negligence, sul se, se uent, ser ice, save life, peril discovered, passenger train, northern railway, negli gence

Document Status: UGLY