v0860-575

No. 2370.

UNITED STATES

CircuitCourt of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit.

Walter B. Bliss and Fresno Mono-

gram Adjustable Buckle Company,

a corporation,

vs.

George P. Spangler,

Appellants,

Appellee.

APPELLEE'S BRIEF IN REPLY TO

APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF.

On permission given at the time of argument,

this reply brief is filed.

Appellee's brief will be found to dispose, gen-

erally, of all the ninth-hour labors of Appellants

reflected in their fragmentary reply brief.

But there are a few features of the case which

the points raised in this Appellants' reply brief

particularly set out in the front for final disposition.

First, Appellants again refer to the prior art, by

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0860

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0860

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0860#page/n574/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

patent, spangler, tongue, spring, reply, device, transcript, stud, shield, patented, neither, lugs, kerfs, infringement, hook

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

spring tongue, transverse bar, special master, patented device, hook engagement, graves patent, wrongfully invaded., warrantedly liberal, unobtrusive aitangement, unitary means, transcript ., submitted raymond, stud produce, studded tongue., struc tures

Document Status: UGLY