v0976-675

No. 2672

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Examiner Printing Company (a corporation),

and William Randolph Hearst,

Plaintiffs in Error ^

vs.

Taggaet Aston,

Defendant in Error,

REPLY OF DEFENDANT IN ERROR TO SUPPLEMENTAL

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES OF PLAINTIFFS

IN ERROR.

Jacob M. Blake,

Attorney for DefendasLinJ^ror.

Filed this.

MAR 2 5 1916 %

...day of March, 1916

1. 1. Monckton,

FRANK D. MONCETON, Clerk. ^^^^^^

By.

Deputy Clerk.

Pbbnatj Publishing Company

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs976

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs976

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs976#page/n674/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

admissible, laid, section, hearst, ground, view, urge, statute, specific, california, authorities, admission, 2053, supreme, respectfully

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

section 2053, william randolph, supplemental points, randolph hearst, imma terial, examiner printing, written maliciously., urge however, testi mony, terial incompetent, taggart aston, taggaet aston, submitted jacob, sub mit, strenuously urge

Document Status: UGLY