v1072-759

IN THE

MnxUh BUUb Qltrrmt (Htuxtt of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT '/

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Blue Goose Mining Company, a cor-

poration,

Plaintiff in Error,

^^' } No. 2880

Northern Light Mining Company, a

corporation.

Defendant in Error.

Brief for Plaintiff in Error.

1. 1. LOMEN,
2. 1. COCHRAN,

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error.

METSON, DREW & MACKENZIE, 11? 1

and E. H. RYAN, I fl k v^ v^,

Of Counsel.

FEB 2 3 1917

Filed this day of February, A. D. ifi^.D. MoncktOH,

1. 1. MONCKTON, Clerk.

By , Deputy.

The .Tames H. Barry Co., 1122 Mission St., San Francisco

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1072

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1072

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1072#page/n758/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

california, corporation, jurisdiction, erred, business, process, courts, sustaining, ness, authority, agent, mining, appearance, lindeberg, goose

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

blue goose, goose mining, jafet lindeberg, ness jafet, foreign corporation, cor poration, cali fornia, san francisco, prima facie, light mining, june 191, northern light, march 191, juris diction, defend ant

Document Status: UGLY