v1230-575

Document Title Page

No, 3365

IN THE

Mnxtth BUttB (Hixtmt Qimtt nf Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

  1. EIKLAND and O. EIKLAND,

Plantiffs in Error,

vs.

    1. CASEY, ALLEN SHATTUCK and

HENRY SHATTUCK,

Defendants in Error.

REPLY TO BRIEF BY JOHN RUSTGARD,

Amicus Curiae.

    1. FAULKNER,

MYRICK & DEERING,

JAMES WALTER SCOTT,

Attorneys for Defendants in Error.

Filed this day of March, A. D. 1920.

    1. MONCKTON, Clerk.

By Deputy Clerk.

The James H. Barry Co.

San Francisco


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1230

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1230

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1230#page/n574/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

water, flood, property, extraordinary, chicago, st, liability, land, reservoir, negligence, liable, injury, pa, ordinary, floods

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

kansas city, paint lick, extraordinary flood, ordinary experience, rain storm, john rustgard, intervening land, allen shattuck, walter scott, usual rainfalls, unusual occurrence, stored water, rustgard amicus, resi dents, prima facie

Document Status: UGLY