v1263-399

Nos. 3446, 3447, 3452, 3453, 3454, 3455,

3458, 3463, 3464, 3486.

In the United States Circuit Court of

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Co., a

Corporation; AVestern Sugar Refinery,. a Corpo-

ration; Haas-Baruch & Co., a Corporation;

United Wholesale Grocery Co., a Corporation;

California Wholesale Grocery Co., a Corpora-

tion; M. A. Newmark & Co., a Corporation;

Stetson-Barret Co., a Corporation; R. L. Craig

& Co., a Corporation; Channel Commercial Co.,

a Corporation; Mailliard & Schmeidell, peti-

tioners,

Federal Trade Commission, Respondent.

BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT.

ADRIEN F. BUSICK,

Acting Chief Counsel.

MARVIN FARRINGTON,

Attorneys for Respondent.

JOSEPH A. BURDEATJ,

Of Counsel.

WASHINGTON : QOTEBNMENT

FTTET)

JAN 1 8 1921

1. 1. MONOtCTON,

ttLa

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1263

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1263

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1263#page/n398/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

los, grocery, angeles, business, wholesale, sugar, brokers, grocers, jobbers, california, trade, commission, unfair, competition, selling

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

los angeles, angeles grocery, wholesale grocers, wholesale grocery, sugar refining, federal trade, trade commission, southern california, western sugar, haas baruch, brokers association, angeles gro, unfair methods, retail grocers, cosmo morgan

Document Status: UGLY