v1311-81

Document Title Page

No. 3824

In The

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

For the Ninth Circuit

CENTRAL CAIillORNIA CANNERIES COMPANY, GRIF-

FIN & SKELLEY COMPANY, J. C. AINSLEY

PACKING COMPANY, ANDERSON-BARNGROVER

MANUFACTURING COMPANY, GOLDEN GATE

PACKING COMPANY, J. F. PYLE & SON, INC.,

HUNT BROTHERS COMPANY, SUNLIT FRUIT

COMPANY,

Appellants,

DUNKLEY COMPANY (now known as Michigan Canning

& Machinery Company) and DUNKLEY COMPANY,

Appellees.

BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES ON DEFEND-

ANTS' APPEALS AND ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION

TO DISMISS THE APPEALS.

F I L E U FRED L. CHAPPELL,

APFw^^T) 1922 Kalamazoo, Michigan.

    1. RICHARDSON,

r*

Wk a r^*.' r- /' T rwi

San Francisco, Calif.

Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellee.

lnt*rstate Bne/ aad Record Co.. DiroiC Mich.


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1311

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1311

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1311#page/n80/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

dunkley, mandate, submitted, district, reopen, recites, assignments, packing, orders, leave, interlocutory, denied, considered, consideration, allowed

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

defend ants, sunlit fruit, son inc., pyle son, hunt brothers, golden gate, gate packing, barngrover manufacturing, anderson barngrover, ainsley packing, wholly improper, ust 22nd, thus refused, submitted fred, sub mitted

Document Status: UGLY