v1397-867

No. 4268

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit / 3

Arthur Hexry Steil, Henry Steil C-o., Inc.^

Henry Steil Company^ Henry Steil Co.,

and Arthur Henry Steil, doing business

imder the names of Henry Steil Co., Inc.,

Henry Steil Company and Henry Steil

Co., and Aethur Henry Steil, John Doe,

Richard Roe, Jane Doe and Minnie Black.

individually and as copartners doing busi-

ness under the firm names and styles of

Henry Steil Co., Inc., Henry Steil Com-

pany and Henry Steil Co.,

Plaintiffs in Error,

vs.

Sidney Holland, Percy Holland, Henry G.

Steel, Frank R. Humm, Lionel S. Hol-

land and Hugh D. Holland, copartners

doing business under the firm name and

style of Holland & Sherry,

Defendants in Error.

BRIEF FOR DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.

FILED

Preston & Du:^^,l - 1954

Attorneys for ^'.ifj^jjfjfctsih"^,^''-

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1397

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1397

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1397#page/n866/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

goods, steil, holland, sherry, trans, transcript, henry, assignment, february, 1921, returned, quality, 1920, york, warranty

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

holland sherry, henry steil, san francisco, sherry goods, ver dict, evi dence, self serving, july 1921, section 1854, civil procedure, 1922 trans, york city, res gestae, poor quality, hol land

Document Status: UGLY