v1549-519

Contents. c^^

Page

Order of Presentation in Brief 2

Federal Trade Commission (Comments on) 5

Analysis of the Complaint

(a) Preamble 12

(b) Body of Complaint 13

Definition of Unfair Trade

Methods of Competition 25

Reference to Monograph in Yale Law Journal on Unfair

Competition by Mr. Charles Grove Haines 31

Definition of phrase "of Interest to the Public" 42

Findings as to the Facts 57

Order to Cease and Desist 72

Action should not Have Been Brought by the Com-

mission 76

Review of the Evidence 79

Testimony of Aganthus Strange 86

Testimony of R. W. Dole 96

Testimony of W. R. K. Young 105

Testimony of Andrew A. Brown 119

Telegram from Macneil & Son to Petitioner 120

Clipping from Los Angeles Times Attached to Copy of

Telegram dated July 2, 1918 121

Telegram from this Petitioner to Andrew A. Brown,

Washington, dated July 2, 1918 122

Testimony of L. B. Norris 123

Right of Petitioner not in Unlawful Combination to

Choose its own customers conspiracy 128

Authorities on the Admissions of Agent as Binding

Upon Principal 132

No Conspiracy by this Petitioner 134

Motive of Commission as to Petitioner Erroneous 15.5

Conclusion 157

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1549

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1549

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1549#page/n518/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

los, angeles, sugar, grocery, commission, business, brown, trade, commerce, public, california, jobbers, petitioner, interstate, competition

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

los angeles, angeles grocery, federal trade, interstate commerce, trade commission, hawaiian sugar, sugar refining, food administration, california hawaiian, public interest, san francisco, unfair methods, los angeles., unfair competition, unfair method

Document Status: UGLY