v1763-511

No. 6856

IN THE

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

For the Ninth Circuit.

October Teem, A. D. 1932. '^

HARRY A. DAUGHERTY, ^

Petitioner,

VS.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent.

BRIEF FOR PETITIONER.

Peftition for Re-

view of Decision

. of United States

Board of Tax

Appeals.

ALBERT L. HOPKINS,

JAY C. HALLS,

PETER L. WENTZ,

Attorneys for Petitioner.

HOPKINS, SUTTER, HALLS & DeWOLFE, FILED

Of Counsel. OCT20 1932

PAUL p. O'BRIEN,

rt.ER

CHICAUO LAW PRrNTING CO., 40 S. CLINTON ST FRANKLIN (121

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1763

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1763

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1763#page/n510/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

income, petitioner, property, contract, wife, taxable, assignment, interest, 2d, commissioner, assignor, tax, assignee, assigned, rec

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

property right, property producing, standard oil, prop erty, income subsequently, subsequently derived, personal services, internal revenue, income tax, commissioner 39, respectfully submitted, peti tioner, income thereafter, income taxable, future earnings

Document Status: UGLY