v1781-861

^

No. 6967

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Woo KiNG-HsUN,

Appellant,

vs.

Pemberton & Penn, Inc.,

Appellee.

APPELLEE'S REPLY TO

APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR A REHEARING.

SCHUHL & LURTON,

72 Szechuen Road, Shanghai, China,

PiLLSBURY, Madison & Sutro,

Alfred Sutro,

Eugene M. Prince,

standard Oil Building, San Francisco, California,

Attorneys for Appellee.

FILED

OCT 1 A 1933

PAUL p. O'BRIEN.

CUEBK

PEBNAn-WALSH Printing Co.. San Fkancisoo

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1781

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1781

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1781#page/n860/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

petition, woo, telegraph, rehearing, sutro, works, submit, san, risk, answers, wrongfully, transmitted, stopped, schuhl, reply

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

woo king, telegraph works, sutro eugene, sutro alfred, san francisco, pillsbury madison, penn inc., pemberton penn, madison sutro, king hsun, francisco california, alfred sutro, york life, wrote false, wrongfully disposed

Document Status: UGLY