v1911-279

No. /

Jfnr tlf? Ntittlj fflirrtttt

AULT AND WEIBORG, a corporation,

Complainant,

vs.

WESTERN BLIND & SCREEN CO., a corporation, also

known as WESTERN VENETIAN. BLIND CO., a cor-

poration,

Respondents.

SAMUEL S. GELBERG, Attorney for Creditors Committee of

WESTERN BLIND & SCREEN CO., a corporation, also

known as WESTERN VENETIAN BLIND CO., a corpo-

ration, and CREDITORS COMMITTEE for WESTERN

BLIND & SCREEN CO., also known as WESTERN

VENETIAN BLIND CO., a corporation.

Appellants,

vs.

1. C RICHARDSON, Receiver for WESTERN BLIND &

SCREEN CO., a corporation, also known as WESTERN

VENETIAN BLIND CO., a corporation.

Appellee.

Upon Appeal from thlT District Court of Jhe United States for the

Southern DistrilEoAjlif^ftia0ntral Division.

r';G2St935

Parker, Stone & Baird Co., Law Printers, Los Angeles.

f ,1

UL r. ^V-Vs.tN

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs1911

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1911

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs1911#page/n278/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

committee, creditors, receiver, petition, district, western, blind, corporation, gelberg, samuel, estate, petitioner, services, 1933, 1935

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

creditors committee, western blind, blind screen, western venetian, venetian blind, southern district, los angeles, services rendered, intervening petition, examined petition, cred itors, richardson receiver, commit tee, examined report, cor poration

Document Status: UGLY