v2038-191

^nitth Stated ^

Ctrctttt Court of ^pptnU

Sac t{ie i^fntfi Cinutt. .

1. 1. EATON,

Petitioner,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent.

Supplemental

^rangtript of Eecorb

Upon Petition to Review a Decision of the United States

Board of j^xpAl

AUG 2 7 1937

PAUL P, O'BRIEN,

CLE ^K

Patker Ptinting Compioy, 34J Stosome Street. San Francisco

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2038

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2038

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2038#page/n190/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

petitioner, tax, trees, 1936, decision, land, purchased, eaton, commissioner, memorandum, apple, destroy, loss, 1937, finding

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

pear trees, internal revenue, eaton petitioner, vacate decision, specific finding, peti tioner, revenue respondent., ap peals, special finding, san francisco, pur chased, 1936 pursuant, memoran dum, counter praecipe, 788 apple

Document Status: UGLY