v2255-995

No. 9779.

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeal:

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Fanchon & Marco, Inc., a corporation,

Appellant,

vs.

Hagenbeck-Wallace Shows Company, a corporation,

Appellee.

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.

MaCFARLANE, ScHAEFER, HaUN & MULFORD,

James H. Arthur and

William Gamble,

By Henry Schaefer, Jr.

1150 Subway Terminal Building, Los Angeles,

Attorneys for Appellant.

JLl

I'arker & Baird Company, Law Printers, Los Angeles.

PAULP.e*BRIN,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2255

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2255

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2255#page/n994/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

contract, cal, waiver, knowledge, finding, equipment, burden, produce, presumption, opening, iv, determining, deleted, argument, witnesses

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

non production, adverse presumption, respecting waiver., houle 200, finding attacked, complete lack, 200 cal., william gamble, schaefer haun, mulford james, marco inc., macfarlane schaefer, henry schaefer, haun mulford, hagenbeck wallace

Document Status: UGLY