v2268x-717

/

No. 9748

In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals

for the Ninth Circuit

County of Alameda (a Body Corporate: and PoiviTic^

AND A PoivlTlCAIv SUBDIVISION OF THK StaTE OF CALI-

FORNIA), APPELLANT^

VS.

United States of America, appellee.

APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF

1^* Ralph E. Hoyt,

District Attorney in and for the County

of Alameda, State of California,

PAULP.e'BRiN

1. 1. COAKLEY,

Chief Assistant District Attorney,

Robert H. McCreary,

Ql.ihf% Assistant District Attorney,

Cecil Mosbacher^

Deputy District Attorney,

Attorneys for Appellant County of Ahameda,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2268x

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2268x

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2268x#page/n716/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

county, contract, license, bridge, section, power, bridges, alameda, br, ed, 1913, void, operate, canal, cal

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

fruitvale avenue, avenue bridge, article xi, tidal canal, municipal corporations, 1909 resolution, maintain repair, section 32, operate maintain, implied power, corpus juris, 1910 license, revocable license, private railroad, harbor lines

Document Status: UGLY