v2502-645

No. 11.766

IN THE

United States

Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

BuKNHAjM Chemical Company, a corpo-

ration,

Appellant,

vs.

Borax Consolidated, Ltd., a corporation,

Pacific Coast Borax Company, a cor-

poration, United States Borax Com-

pany, a corporation, Sterling Borax

Company, a corporation, and American

Potash & Chemical Corporation,

Appellees.

PETITION FOR REHEARING

Thurman Arnold,

1200 Eighteenth Street, N. W.

Washington 6, D. C, ^

of Counsel.

Steeling Cabk,

One Montgomery Street,

San Francisoo 4, California,

Attorney for Appellant.

N0V2fi 1948

PARKER PRINTING COMPANY. I80 FIRST STREET. SAN FRANCISCO

PAUL P. O'BRlBiM,

OLERK

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2502

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2502

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2502#page/n644/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

conspiracy, overt, damages, statute, placer, activities, 1929, carr, lease, borax, ct, antitrust, business, limitations, fraud

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

antitrust laws, searles lake, peoples tobacco, consolidated ltd., borax consolidated, american potash, limitations begins, damages resulting, coast borax, 1929 conspiracy, respectfully submit, prima facie, potash chemical, placer activities, pacific coast

Document Status: UGLY