v2687-353

No. 12845.

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

The Stuart Company,

Petitioner,

vs.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue,

Respondent.

REPLY BRIEF IN BEHALF OF THE STUART

COMPANY, PETITIONER.

1. Calder Mackay,

Arthur McGregor,

Howard W. Reynolds,

Adam Y. Bennion,

Richard N. Mackay,

728 Pacific Mutual Building,

523 West Sixth Street,

Los Angeles 14, California,

1. Edward Little,

402 fiallingsworth Building,

606 South Hill Street,

Los Angeles 14; -California,

Counsel for Petitioner.

Parker & Company, Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-9171.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2687

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2687

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2687#page/n352/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

mark, trade, stuart, contract, wiseman, paid, vita, food, commissioner, tax, purchase, hanisch, cancellation, consideration, settlement

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

trade mark, vita food, food corporation, trade mark., exclusive sales, non exclusive, better product, wiseman insisted, wiseman advised, ultimate issue, testi mony, sup ported, stuart formula., street los, standard brands

Document Status: UGLY