v2730x-69
United States Court of Appeals
For the Ninth Circuit
No. 13011
REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS.
BERNICE FEITLEB and IRWIN FEITLER,
Individually and Trading as
Gardner & Company,
Petitioners,
vs.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Respondent.
Petition to Review An Order Of
The Federal Trade Commission
PETITIONERS' ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR THAT "THE
HEARING GRANTED PETITIONERS HEREIN DID
NOT COMPLY WITH THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF
THE CONSTITUTION NOR WITH THE ADMINISTRA-
TIVE PRACTICES ACT" IS PROPERLY RAISED BY
THE PETITIONERS' STATEMENT OF POINT.
- James,
9448 Drake Ave.. t
Evanston, 111.,
Attorney for Petitioners.
Of Counsel :
George E. Lindelof, Jr.,
215 West Seventh Street,
Los Angeles, Calif.
The Scheffer Press, Inc. ANdover 3-6850
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2730x
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2730x
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2730x#page/n68/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
petitioners, commission, unfair, public, punch, brewer, boards, merchandise, contention, trade, competition, methods, introduce, gambling, interstate
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
punch boards, federal trade, unfair methods, trade commission, public interest, interstate shipment, self evident, distribute merchandise, unfair method, reilly postmaster, public policy, properly raised, petitioners contend, lottery devices, peti tioners
Document Status: UGLY