v2912-307
INDEX
Page
Statement of Jurisdiction 1
Question Presented 3
Statement of the Case 3
Specification of Errors 7
Summary of Argument 9
Argument 15
- Transfers (including assignments) are valid
as against trustee in bankruptcy except as
provided in 60, 67 and 70 of the Bank-
ruptcy Act 15
II. The assignment here is not invalidated by
60a (1) and (2) or 70c of the Bankruptcy
Act 19
- 60a (1) and (2) and 70c recognize as
valid transfers which, under applicable
state law, are valid as against execution
creditors of assignor 19
- A partner's interest in the partnership is
intangible personal property under the
Uniform Partnership Act and is assign-
able 23
- Under Washington Law, assignments of
intangible personal property rights are
valid as against execution creditors, with
only three exceptions 29
- The three exceptions to validity of as-
signments under Washington law are not
applicable here 37
- The assignment of a partnership in-
terest is not the assignment of an
account receivable 37
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2912
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2912
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2912#page/n306/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
partnership, assignment, property, interest, partner, bankruptcy, trustee, transfer, section, bankrupt, 2d, wash, assignee, rights, assignor
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
partnership interest, personal property, section 60a, uniform partnership, partnership property, execution creditors, specific partnership, partner ship, assigning partner, intangible property, accounts receivable, intangible personal, bay boom, open book, chattel mortgage
Document Status: UGLY