v2940-1279

H

I in Seattle for Olson to sell the Bo-

tbe Rankin contract. It is true that

erty was sold in Seattle and de-

orf s bank account in Vancouver.

Corporation is a Washington cor-

timony concerning that came sole-

ijjellee's case to refer to the "loot"

) of her brief.

s

?nt relative to the statute of limi-

leen covered in our opening brief.

t out that all of the testimony re-

e under this portion of her brief,

wn testimony or merely is a refer-

f the Court.

it is worthy of note that appellee,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2940

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2940

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2940#page/n1278/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

wash, pac, ulterior, statute, spokane, seattle, seasonably, refer, instrument, inquiry, inland, dt, concerning, bank, xxi

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

spokane dt, dt inland, written instrument, wilson creek, whose rights, washington cor, timony concerning, tbe rankin, support whatsoever, sole ijjellee, seasonably detected, rights rest, rankin contract., ordinary care, oppor tunity

Document Status: UGLY