v2962-1153

Case No. 15035

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

INTERMOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT COMPANY,

Petitioner,

vs.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Respondent.

ON PETITION TO REVIEW AND SET ASIDE

A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

REPLY BRIEF OF PETITIONER

INTERMOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT COMPANY

It is the purpose of the petitioner in this reply

brief to call to the Court's attention certain inac-

curacies of the factual statements contained in the brief

of the respondent National Labor Relations Board. The

Board asserts that the contract negotiated between

the company and the union, except for an hourly

wage increase, did not provide benefits to the em-

ployees covered thereby which they had not previously

enjoyed (Respondent's brief, page 7). This, of course,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs2962

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2962

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs2962#page/n1152/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

employees, unit, union, bonuses, benefits, increases, employer, contract, labor, work, seems, increase, contrary, worked, week

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

represented employees, national labor, merit increases, labor relations, disparate treatment, discourage union, covered thereby, work week, wage increase, unrepresented employees, unrepresented em, union membership, unfair labor, treated differently, sick leave.

Document Status: UGLY