v3002-549

No. 14,968

United States

COURT OF APPEALS

for the Ninth Circuit

HARRY X. BERGMAN, PERMA-LOX ALUMINUM

SHINGLE CORPORATION and VICTOR H.

LANGVILLE, doing business under the assumed

name of Langville Manufacturing Company,

Appellants- Petitioners,

vs.

ALUMINUM LOCK SHINGLE CORPORATION OF

AMERICA,

Appellee-Respondent.

PETITION FOR REHEARING

FILED

NOV -8 iyi^

Robert F. Maguire, py^UL P. O'BRIEN* OtK

723 Pittock Block,

Portland 5, Oregon, 4

1. Pierre Kousch, J

515 Pacific Building, *

Portland 4, Oregon,

Counsel for Petitioners.

STEVENS-NESS LAW PUB. CO., PORTLAND. ORE. 11-56

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3002

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3002

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3002#page/n548/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

langville, 1292, lox, district, bergman, usca, perma, infringement, appealable, petition, appealed, shingle, petitioners, merits, issues

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

usca 1292, perma lox, shingle corporation, bergman perma, pierre kolisch, lox aluminum, lock shingle, langville manufacturing, interlocutory orders, aluminum shingle, aluminum lock, ville separately, view contrary, unfair competition., unfair competition

Document Status: UGLY