v3165-813

Document Title Page

No. 16282.

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Rexall Drug Company, a corporation, and Arnold

  1. Lewis, doing business as Studio Cosmetics Com-

pany,

Appellants,

vs,

Sandra Mae Nihill, etc.,

Appellee.

Reply Brief of Appellant Arnold L. Lewis, Doing

Business as Studio Cosmetics Company.

Reed, Callaway, Kirtland & Packard, -.. f. v^ jl

639 South Spring Street,

Los Angeles 14, California, AUG 1 9 1959

Henry E. Kappler, ^^^^ p O'BRlbiH. Cle

215 West Seventh Street,

Los Angeles 14, California,

Attorneys for Appellant Arnold L. Lewis, Doing

Business as Studio Cosmetics Company.

Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-917L


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3165

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3165

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3165#page/n812/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

hair, thio, negligence, 2d, res, loquitur, ipsa, lewis, doctrine, bish, product, application, cosmetics, toxic, toni

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

res ipsa, studio cosmetics, ipsa loquitur, ipsa loquitur., inherently dangerous, permanent wave, liability ins., home mut., grand forks, forks imp., employers liability, burning sensation, bobby pins, 2d 62, utterly insufficient

Document Status: UGLY