v3239-105

Nos. 18,557 and 18,558

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

United States of America,

Appellant,

vs.

1. 1. Benning, et al.,

Appellees.

United States of America,

Appellant,

vs.

John H. Dunshee, et al.,

Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of California,

Central Division

BRIEF FOR APPELLEES

Philip H. Angell,

Angell, Adams, Gochnaijer,

Elder & Holmes,

Louis Le Baron,

200 Bush Street, San Francisco 4, California,

Attorneys for Appellees. e" - ^ l"^

Robert M. Jones,

Price, Postel & Parma, r , , ^ ^ Iqcq

21 E. Canon Perdido Street, Santa Barbara, California,

Attornetts for Appellee ,-r^A...^ .. ^^...m.^ ^

1. .7 7^ T ^.' ^RAIMK H. SCHMia CLER'^

Dorothy D. Battm.

MosE Silverman,

200 Bush Street, San Francisco 4, California,

Of Counsel.

PERNAU-V/ALSH PRINTING CO., SAN FRANCIBCD

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3239

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3239

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3239#page/n104/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

commission, 2d, government, findings, ca, district, sales, objections, property, land, report, witnesses, finding, review, comparable

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

comparable sales, expert witnesses, clearly erroneous, fair market, emphasis added, clearly erroneous., water resources, sales submitted, ultimate finding, prop erty, federal rules, corporation ca, added ., twin city, subsidiary findings

Document Status: UGLY