v3355-167

Nos. 20121, 20122

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

and L. E. DIXON COMPANY, Appellants,

vs.

VAN HARRIS, an individual, doing business as Harris & Sons,

Appellee.

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

and L. E. DIXON COMPANY, Appellants,

vs.

PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC., and VAN HARRIS,

an individual doing business as Harris & Sons,

Appellees.

PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC., Appellant,

vs.

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

and L. E. DIXON COMPANY, Appellees.

Reply Brief of Appellants L. E, Dixon Company and

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland.

Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, ^, ' iQ ^*S

811 West Seventh Street, "^^ (, ..

Los Angeles, California, ^fiA/ii '

Attorneys for Appellees. ^' Sqi,

Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-917L

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3355

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3355

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3355#page/n166/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

paramount, dixon, yost, contract, harris, inc, contractor, miller, cal, reply, supp, work, conner, 2d, br

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

reply br., sterling brukar, joint venture, cal tech, para mount, financial responsibility, van harris, truck rental, rental inc., paramount truck, dixon liable, brukar inc., prime contractor, paramount contends, harris sons

Document Status: UGLY