v3355-91

Document Title Page

No. 20121, 20122

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

and L. E. DIXON COMPANY,

Appellants,

vs.

VAN HARRIS, an individual, doing business as Harris & Sons,

Appellee.

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

and L. E. DIXON COMPANY,

Appellants,

vs.

PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC., and VAN HARRIS,

an individual doing business as Harris & Sons,

Appellees.

PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC.,

Appellant,

vs.

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

and L. E. DIXON COMPANY,

Appellees.

On Appeal From the United States District Court for the

Southern District o California, Central Division.

Brief of Appellants L. E. Dixon Company and

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland.

Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & KT* I I

Bridges,

James W. Baldwin, jUL 2 o i355

Robert K. Worrell,

Andrew J. Nocas, FRANK H. SCHMIO, CLEii;^

811 West Seventh Street,

Los Angeles, Calif. 90017,

Attorneys for Appellants L. E. Dixon

Company and Fidelity and Deposit

Company of Maryland.

Parker & Son, Inc., Law Printers, Los Angeles. Phone MA. 6-917L


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3355

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3355

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3355#page/n90/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

dixon, harris, contract, cal, yost, work, 2d, contractor, subcontract, paramount, subcontractor, district, perform, payment, bond

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

cal tech, payment bond, prime contractor, har ris, written subcontract, prime contract, written contract, para mount, van harris, sub contractor, principal contractor, paramount truck, move ins, ma terial, dixon breached

Document Status: UGLY