v3377-407

35

It is submitted that Appellants have failed to sus-

tain any of their specifications of error and that,

therefore, the judgment of the trial Court below

should be affirmed.

Dated, Honolulu, Hawaii,

April 1, 1966.

Respectfully submitted,

Anthony B. Craven,

m for Frank D. Gibson, Jr.,

Attorney for Appellee

Clarence C. T. Loo,

Henshaw, Conroy & Hamilton,

Of Coimsel.

Certificate of Counsel

I certify that, in connection with the preparation of

this brief, I have examined Rules 18 and 19 of the

United States Court of Appeals, for the Ninth Circuit,

and that, in my opinion, the foregoing brief is in full

compliance with those rules.

Anthony B. Craven,

' for FkANK D. Gibson, Jr.,

Attorney for Appellee

Clarence C. T, Loo,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3377

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3377

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3377#page/n406/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

submitted, rules, loo, gibson, craven, clarence, anthony, tain, sus, specifications, respectfully, preparation, honolulu, henshaw, hawaii

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

sus tain, submitted anthony, respectfully submitted, loo henshaw, loo , honolulu hawaii, henshaw conroy, hawaii april, examined rules, conroy hamilton

Document Status: UGLY