v3440-89

• 7 -

ppropriation; moreover, the Secretary concluded, Alaska's ap-

licatlon was valid (R. 7-*2d). The district court reversed

he decision of the Secretary of the Interior on the grounds

'hat the State's application was invalid (R. 207-223). Judg-

I

ent was entered on appellees' motion for summary judgment (R.

i

24). From that judgment, the Secretary of the Interior and

he State of Alaska appealed (R. 226, 231).

SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS

1. The district court erred in entering judgment for

ppellees and not granting summary judgment for appellants.

1. The district court erred in reversing the admin-

strative determination of the Secretary of the Interior.

1. The district court erred in asserting jurisdic-

:ion under the Administrative Procedure Act.

1. The district court erred in holding that the appli-

ation for selection filed by the State of Alaska the first ap-

(lication of record did not segregate the land described there -

.n from subsequent appropriation by the appellees.

1. The district court erred in holding that the ap-

dication for the selection of land filed by the State of Alaska

ras invalid.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3440

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3440

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3440#page/n88/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

land, selection, alaska, lands, application, anchorage, secretary, public, district, amendments, 058566, interior, 640, unsurveyed, meridian

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

meridian unsurveyed, land management, anchorage alaska, seward meridian, management anchorage, land office, natural resources, avenue anchorage, lands 344, anchorage watershed, sixth avenue, selection application, public land, bell director, 344 sixth

Document Status: UGLY