v3452-9

Document Title Page

INDEX

Page

Jurisdiction *

Statement of the case 2

  1. The Board's findings of fact 2

  2. The representation proceeding 2

  3. The unfair labor practice proceeding 6

II. The Board's conclusions and order 7

Q

Argument

The Board properly found that respondent violated

Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act by refusing to

recognize and to bargain with a union which had

been duly elected and certified as the bargaining

representative of an appropriate unit of respond-

ent's employees

  1. The Board properly found that the Com-

pany's new and used car-truck salesmen

constitute an appropriate bargaining unit- 8

  1. The Board properly held that an employee

of another employer who was a union ofli-

cial could act as the Union's election ob-

17

server ^

  1. The Board properly rejected the contention

that summary judgment against the Com-

pany was improper 20

Conclusion 25

Certificate - 26

Appendix A - 27

Appendix B 28

AUTHORITIES CITED

Cases:

Acme Industrial Products, Inc. V. N.L.R.B., 373

  1. 2d 530 (C.A. 3), enforcing per curiam, 158

NLRB 180 ._. 23-24


archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3452

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3452

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3452#page/n8/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

2d, nlrb, unit, union, employer, election, bargaining, employees, cir, inc, labor, salesmen, section, supra, respondent

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

regional director, single employer, employer unit, national labor, unfair labor, multi employer, labor relations, labor practice, collective bargaining, unit determination, 5th cir., union official, cert denied, metropolitan life, 9th cir.

Document Status: UGLY