v3498-519

No. 22,679

IN THE

United States Court of Appeals

For the Ninth Circuit

Spring Crest Company, a corporation, Thomas

1. Stubblefield, James F. Brooks, and

John H. Hancock,

Appellants,

vs.

American Beauti Pleat, Inc., a corporation,

and Orville T. Stall,

Appellees.

Appeal from Judgment of the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF

Bernard Kjriegel,

6505 Wilshire Boulevard,

Los Angeles, California 90048,

MeLLIN, HaNSCOM & HURSH,

Oscar A. Mellin,

Carlisle M. Moore,

111 Sutter street,

San Francisco, California 94104,

Attorneys for Appellants. 2EP

PiLED

^M a LUCK

a

EKk

FCRNAU-WALBH PRJNTING CO., SAN FRANCIBCO

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs3498

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3498

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs3498#page/n518/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

claims, spring, glides, glide, patent, art, findings, specification, district, pleater, patented, finding, erred, drapery, stubblefield

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

spring crest, spring pleater, holding claims, art glides, patent misuse, close hook, spring pleater., drapery installations, mercoid corp., unpatented parts, resilient pin, pin seat, patented combination, lounsbury patents, lounsbury glide

Document Status: UGLY