v0004-239

No. 28.

IN THE

United Stales Circuit Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

WM. H. LAKIN, Plaintiff in Error,

vs.

1. 1. ROBERTS et al., Defendants in Error.

PETITION FOR REHEARING.

Attorney for Petitio7ier.

GEO. SPAULDING & CO., PRS., 114 CLAY ST., SAN FRANCISCO.

MAR -4 1893

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0004

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0004

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0004#page/n238/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

1872, rights, statute, construction, mining, right, section, patent, surface, land, statutes, laws, 1866, claims, congress

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

revised statutes, land office, retrospective construction, vested rights, land department, existing rights, rights acquired, public lands, mining locations, mining claims, end lines, retrospective operation, retro spective, prospective construction, patent issued

Document Status: UGLY