v0012-647

No. 82.

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

NINTH CIRCUIT.

PAUL A. ENGLISH and

ARTHUR F. ENGLISH, Copartners,

Plaintiffs in Error,

Vs.

THE SPOKANE COMMISSION COMPANY,

Defendant in Error.

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, DISTRICT

OF WASHINGTON, EASTERN DIVISION.

REPLY BRIEF OF PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.

1. 1. BROME, and

AYLETT R. COTTON,

Attorneys for PlaintifiFs in Error.

APR 2g 1893

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0012

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0012

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0012#page/n646/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

warranty, eggs, potatoes, spokane, quality, purchase, profits, implied, property, contract, inspection, falls, resale, memorandum, hearsay

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

spokane falls, express warranty, implied warranty, strictly fresh, spokane commission, unmerchantable potatoes, supposed profits, pur pose, issues tried, english copartners, 94 cal., washington eastern, warranty related, warranty arises, warranty applied

Document Status: UGLY