v0045-137

No. 264.

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeais

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

MARIE E. CHAUCHE et al.,

Plaintiffs in Error,

vs.

1. 1. PARE.

Defendant in Error.

Brief for Plaintiffs in Error.

WHEATON, KALLOCH & KIERCE,

For Plaintiffs in Error.

VAMEt H. BARIIT, POINTER, 429 MONTQOMERi ST.. S. F.

FILE

FE3 3-1896

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0045

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0045

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0045#page/n136/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

lille, patent, assignment, pare, letters, attempted, 1886, owner, void, title, ratification, instrument, power, erred, toulouse

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

attempted assignment, toulouse delorieux, patent sued, letters patent, aime pare, dominique lille, attempted assign, sole owner, attempted assignment., 88 ., void assignment, void ab, toulouse delorieux., section 858, properly executed

Document Status: UGLY