v0079-543

1. 1. No. 1577.

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

THE FRESNO CANAL & IRRIGATION COMPANY,

PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,

vs.

ADELINE B. PARK, et al., DEFENDANTS and APPELLANTS.

REVISED BRIEF AND ARGUMENT OF

RESPONDENT ON SUBMISSION.

JOHN GABER and FRANK H. SHORT,

Attorneys for Respondents,

Filed 2olh September, i8gg, Geo. W. Root, Clerk.

ALSO FILED IN

No. 419.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS.

SAN DIEGO FLUME CO., APPELLANT,

vs.

1. 1. SOUTHER and N. T. CROSBY, APPELLEES.

BRIEF OF JOHN GARBER and FRANK H.

SHORT, Amici Curiae.

Filed October , iSgg,

'^.^^'h , Clerk.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0079

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0079

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0079#page/n542/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

water, contract, rates, public, contracts, land, right, rate, property, constitution, rights, consumer, statute, perrin, canal

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

perrin contract, water right, water rates, furnish water, water rights, fresno canal, public policy, vested right, prop erty, private property, furnishing water, appro priated, 80 cal., whi di, vested rights

Document Status: UGLY