v0139-523

IN THE

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

EXCELSIOR WOODEN PIPE

COMPANY,

Appellant,

vs.

PACIFIC BRIDGE COMPANY

and CHARLES P. ALLEN,

Appellees.

No. 668.

APPELLANTS BRIEF.

WM. F. BOOTH,

1. 1. ACKER,
2. 1. WILSHIRE,
3. 1. KENAGA,

Solicitors for Appella 7it .

PHILLIPS fc SMYTH, PRINTERS, SOS CLAV STREET, S. f.

FILED

JAN 23 1901

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0139

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0139

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0139#page/n522/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

jurisdiction, patent, license, bill, complainant, contract, arising, allen, situation, title, infringement, licensor, licensee, laws, below

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

patent laws, pacific bridge, wooden pipe, supra ., juris diction, exclusive license, atherton machine, licensor allen, letters patent, bill alone, requested argument, patentee allen, excelsior wooden, chief justice, atwood morrison

Document Status: UGLY