v0141-453
IN THE
United States Circuit Court of Appeals
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
THE BLYTHE COMPANY (a Cor-
poration),
Appellant,
vs.
FLORENCE BLYTHE HINCKLEY,
JOHN W. BLYTHE and HENRY
- BLYTHE,
Appellees.
No. 661.
ED
APR 2 -1901
I
Appendix to Reply Brief on Behalf of Appellant.
Praying the indulgence of the Court, we beg leave to add
to our reply brief, as an appendix thereto, the following
reply to the statements of Mrs. Hinckley's reply brief:
- On page i of their brief, counsel for Mrs.
Hinckley say :
"The term did not expire until July nth. So
that the order of the Court setting aside the adjourn-
ment * * * was within the term as prescribed
by law."
That statement is, we submit, erroneous. The statute
fixes only the first day of the term, but not its duration.
And the end of the term is (Bronson vs. Schulten, 104
- S., 410, 415, and other cases cited on pages 14S-152
of our opening brief) when the Court adjourns sine die.
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0141
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0141
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0141#page/n452/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
hinckley, bill, blythe, term, 1897, paper, ground, reply, laches, july, opening, judgments, cross, contention, consideration
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
cross bill, florence blythe, adoption paper, blythe hinckley, various grounds, tran script, though errors, su preme, sup plemental, sufficiently taxed, sufficiently considered., subsequent consideration, submit erroneous., stood silent, statute fixes
Document Status: UGLY