v0148-550
NO. 691.
IN THE
United States Circuit Court of Appeals
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CHARLES EISENBEIS. et al..
Defendants.
Charles Eisenbeis and Kate
ElSENBEIS,
Appellants and
FILE
Plaintiffs in Error, I ^^^ 1 - 190
vs.
- Long. Clementine Long and
Francis L. Bash,
Petitioners, Appellees
and Defendants in Error.
Writ of Error and Appeal from the United States District
Court for the District of Washington, NortJtern Division.
BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
ALLEN WEIR, T. J. HUMES,
- BUDDRESS. L. S. B. SAWYER.
Attorneys for Defendants in Error and Respondents .
archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0148
Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0148
Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0148#page/n549/mode/1up
Top Keywords (auto-generated):
jurisdiction, land, federal, courts, title, money, eisenbeis, district, process, determine, wife, condemnation, collateral, supreme, right
Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):
juris diction, charles eisenbeis, eminent domain, collateral proceeding, concurrent jurisdiction, collateral attack, code wash., try title, obtained jurisdiction, money paid, kate eisenbeis, february 1898, acquired jurisdiction, successfully attacked, sub ject
Document Status: UGLY