v0152-111

No. 698.

IN THE

iiTED mm ciRcyiT coort of uppehls

For the Ninth Circuit.

WILLIAM WOLFF,

Plaintiff in Error,

VS.

WELLS, FARGO & COMPANY (a cor-

poration),

Defendant in Error.

Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Error.

Vogelsang & Brown,

Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error,

c : 1

Pernau Bros. Brint, 083

-1^

^^

NOV IX 1901

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0152

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0152

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0152#page/n110/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

contract, writing, conversation, written, parol, construction, cement, work, wells, fargo, specifications, quantity, building, rehfuss, meaning

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

wells fargo, mining timbers, september 24th, written contract, william wolff, work itself, vogelsang brown, verbal contract, ultimate measure, tancred arrol, sub ject, special findings, right freely, ques tions, previous season

Document Status: UGLY