v0172-321

Nos. 748 and 749.

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

For The Ninth Circuit.

1. 1. SOELBERG et al.,

Plaintiffs in Error,

VS.

rlLfel

WESTERN ASSURANCE CO. OF APF

TORONTO, CANADA (a corporation),

Defendant in Error.

Defendant's Reply Brief.

Nathan H. Frank,

Attorney for Defendant in Error.

Pernau Bros. Friut, 543 CUy St., S. F.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0172

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0172

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0172#page/n320/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

insured, loss, policy, reply, damage, bill, repaired, suggestion, western, partial, net, however, exceptions, argument, 75

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

western assurance, partial loss, useless expense, toronto canada, san francisco, rendered useless, net costs, bill settled, alone postponed, 2nd ed., worse confounded, western assur, vo age, vessel exceeding, utmost fairness

Document Status: UGLY