v0176-557

NO. 768

IN THE

United States Circuit Court of Appeals

FOR THE NINTH URCUT

1. 1. ENGELSTADT,

Plaintiff in Error

vs. No. 768

1. 1. DUFRESNE,

Defendant in Error

Petition for Re-Hearing

1. 1. 1. VARIEL,

GORDON HALL,

JACKSON PITMAN & FINK,

IRA 1). ORTON,

Attorneys for Appellant.

UPON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA, SECOND DIVISION

FILED

MAY 19 1902

F.. D. Beattic, 538 Calil

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0176

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0176

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0176#page/n556/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

claims, dufresne, contract, engelstad, operated, word, selection, mining, written, undeveloped, interest, decision, work, operation, intelligent

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

word operated, intelligent selection, du fresne, written contract, engel stad, variel gordon, undeveloped claims, mining claims, gordon hall, contract itself, testi fies, specific performance, permit dufresne, oral argument, operated contained

Document Status: UGLY