v0205-87

No. 860

IN THE

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

i-wu -.,., v.^

1. 1. AMES AND D. J. HORGAN;

Plaintiffs in Error,

VS. ) n^T 9-*^ ^'

PETER FARRELLY,

Defendant in Error.

BRIEf rOR PLAINTirrS IN ERROR.

1. 1. Campbell,
2. 1. MEtSON,
3. 1. Campbell,

Ira D. Orton,

Campbell, Metson & Campbell,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs in Error,

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0205

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0205

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0205#page/n86/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

work, creek, henry, harris, petrick, quartz, mining, farrelly, dahl, contract, partnership, labor, ames, performed, 1901

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

harris creek, harris creek., quartz creek, dahl creek, undivided interest, peter farrelly, mining partnership., work performed, mining partnership, joe henry, henry conveyed, dahl creeks, relation existed, quartz creeks, partnership relation

Document Status: UGLY