v0212-457

No. 886

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, DAVID C. CLARK;

FRED. R. WALTI, HENRY WILLEY,

FRANK K. ROBERTS, JOHN B. MAHER,

AND F. W. LUCAS, ( ?;r i rr i-

Plaintiffs in Error, ) ^ ' -" 3ii. a-

VS. ( SEP -3 130.

ALBERT H. WAITE,

Defendant in Error.

POINTS AND AITIIORITIES ON BEtlALf Or

DEfENDANT IN ERROR.

THOMAS & GERSTLE,

Attorneys for Defendant in Error.

LINDSAY & NETHERTON,

JAMES G. MAGUIRE,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs in Error.

Filed this day of Se-ptemher, 1902.

Clerh.

THE FILMER BROS. CO. PRINT, 424 SAN30UE ST., S. F.

---

archive.org Volume Name: govuscourtsca9briefs0212

Volume: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0212

Document Link: http://archive.org/stream/govuscourtsca9briefs0212#page/n456/mode/1up

Top Keywords (auto-generated):

tax, levy, duty, city, mandamus, interest, power, alternative, bonds, payment, county, charter, special, principal, peremptory

Top Key Phrases (auto-generated):

special tax, term forthwith, col lect, annual tax, santa cruz, political code, extraordinary remedies, city council, bonds issued, word forthwith, ter commanded, tax levy, taxing power, suffi cient, special fund

Document Status: UGLY